Article 15 and 22 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition The landlord filed a removal request against the tenant due to the expiration of the tenancy, default on payment of rent and structural changes to the rental premises. The tenant moved the request for leave. Defend on the basis that he was living in the legal premises because the rent controller rejected the leave application for defense and ordered the tenant to vacate the premises appeal filed by the tenant. Was excluded, the landlord and the tenant belonging to the tenant were denied leave by the landlord in defense of the mortgage agreement executed by the son of the landlord in favor of the mortgage. In the application for, the mortgage-related documents were not registered and the landlord's claim was not registered Collection was not implementing what was the true owner of the rented premises. Failure to furnish any document of title to the part of the rental premises or suit property in favor of it would require the landlord to terminate the tenancy of the tenant to establish the authenticity of the mortgage agreement in his favor. Could not be brought in accordance with the provisions of the Rated Premise Ordinance, 2007 which relates to tenants who came into existence after the issuance of the said ordinance or who were tenants failing to indicate any wrongdoing or material evidence. Which could affect the simultaneous withdrawal of results by both courts, under which other intellectuals Constitutional jurisdiction
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
