Section 47, 151 and AXXI, Rr 33, 35 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), for the recovery of possession of open plot by the specific performance of the section 52 sale agreement. In the application for recovery of possession of the suit plot executed in the sale process in favor of 1515 CPC, the buyers subsequently claimed through the registered sale deed that they had constructed and occupied the house on the suit plot. I was, thus, a decree against such open plot cannot be abolished. The Implementing Court has demanded the removal of such a request by the Appellate Court after the buyer filed the amended plaint, but without seeking relief from the cancellation of the sale agreement and its superstructure executive court. After the demolition, it had to be imprisoned in all four corners of the decree and no further than that the words used in OXI, R 35, CPC were subject to the competence of the decree, which would mean the decision. Were obliged to pass the decree, to another person, even if he is a tenant, in possession of such order. I can not be forced to Rahm, the creditors of the debtor time to judge the current case was filed. Neither a defaulter nor an unauthorized resident, but he entered the suit plot on the basis of a registered sale deed, the decision was not against the decision-maker, nor was the buyer's implication in such a case thereafter. Can direct the delivery of the occupation and no more. Regarding implementation of the order to the extent of smuggling supplies
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
