SHAHID ORAKZAI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
Arts 185 (2) (f), 132 (3) and 199 Maintaining Constitutional Appeals Luxury Standards Concepts Controversial Person High Chief Minister's Certificate Under Article 185 (2) f of the Constitution, the High Court Petitioner advised the Governor Removed. As a result, the removal of seven ministers from the provincial cabinet raised by the applicant was a result of his right to challenge the advice of the chief minister, as he was a citizen of Pakistan, thus creating Article 199 ( a) A person was a victim under clause (i). The demand for the issuance of a certificate by the High Court under Article 185 (2) (f) of the Constitution and its status as a citizen of Pakistan was not considered a good reason for the advice of the Chief Minister to remove the applicants. can go. The Ministers Petitioner is a candidate against the Chief Minister, from whom it was announced that the Chief Minister was also not dressed in the proper position and qualifications of the applicant. To challenge the constitutional performance of public duties, it was not decided by the Chief Minister to apply the concept of Lux Standy evenly to the courts in the light of the facts of each case. Must be determined, in order to qualify as an individual. The grieving individual may not be able to justify it in the strictest jurisprudence, but he nonetheless has to prove that some of his interests have been affected by the act of prejudice. The courts were reluctant to allow only a "busy body" to intervene in matters that did not belong. Their concept of a direct applicant / professional litigation and \ medal Muslim interloper of
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
