MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus DIRECTOR ANTI-CORRUPTION, SARGODHA
Article 409 The Prevention of Corruption Act (Second of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application proved that the criminal breach of trust by the public servant and termination of the FIR inquiry proved that the participant The accused along with the accused were charged with money. The registry; and when their fraud was revealed, they deposited the money in the state treasury saying they had been guilty of the crime, the inquiry officer recommended a prosecution against him and the matter was investigated. Has been completed and the invoice was submitted. The competent High Court, in exercising its powers under Article 199 of the Constitution, could not take the role of investigator or search the crime or innocence filed by the investigating officer from the bare point of view of the FIR, but also by the Treasury. By submitting the amount of embezzlement by the accused, the first one, constitutes an adversarial offense, however, if the defendant feels that there is no reasonable way to prosecute him for the crime. Content, he or she can approach the trial court for any intervention to get rid of it. The High Court is certainly on the verge of stopping the usual rule of law, which was not a mandate of the law, the constitutional petition was filed The constitutional petition was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
