Section 497 Defamation Code (XLV of 1860), section 337 D / 337 F (v) / 337 F (i) / 148/149 Jifa, Damiya and Hashima bail, refuse court order to settle the matter within a specified period. ? The trial court recorded 16 of the prosecution's 18 witnesses and the statements of the two police officers were yet to be recorded; there is no doubt that the direction of the High Court will decide the case before the specified time, however, the accused. Will not be entitled to the discount of the guarantee. On this basis, the direction of the superior court to settle a case during the course of a particular trial was always in nature. And as far as possible this instruction should be followed, keeping in view the interests of justice, that sacrifices were not made to address the sacrifices of justice quickly. The direction issued by the High Court to the trial court relates to the end of an in-house trial. The prescribed period was only an administrative direction and the accused would not have any right to bail if the order was not complied with by the trial court due to any negligence or any new progress in the trial. The follower of the sheet showed that the accused party also cooperated in delaying the trial, requesting some postponement bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
