Sections 2 (b (b) /, /, 4 324/34, 666 / & 34 & 4 39 // 34 Q) Killings, attempted murder, injury to commit self-injury, value of evidence The benefit of the suspect took place at night The FIR did not specify any source of light, later, witnesses presented the torch and moonlight in the flashlight as the source of the incident said the moonlight at the time of the incident. The prosecution did not prove that the prosecution witnesses had the benefit of the doubt arising from the refusal to pay lacuna, nothing was recovered from the accused, no article was returned, nor any The crime was empty and blood was not deposited by the police on the ground.The place of the incident was registered after 18 hours of unspecified interruption of the incident and after 15 hours of medical examination of the injured, unknown suspects. Five months after the incident, the identity of the accused in the parade had no source for the accused's involvement in the case. The accused had no previous criminal history. The description is not in accordance with the details of the present accused. Verbal testimony was not supported; the purpose of recovering the suspect and medical evidence was the benefit of the doubt. Under the circumstances, the accused was escalated and accordingly he was acquitted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
