MUHAMMAD AMEER AZAM versus ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY, BAHAWALPUR
Sections 2, 11A, 21 (II) and 42 of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 (2), the right to appeal the appeal to the Intro Court, to amend or revise the appeals for a period of one year. Was set on the basis of And the university authorities terminated their agreements, which were approved by the university, applied by a single High Court judge who raised that the intra-court appeal was not a valid syndicate, In view of section 21 (ii), it was read with section 2 of the Islamic University Bahawalpur Act. In 1975, the authority of the University of the Syndicate was the authority, therefore, it was the decision of the authority to terminate the services of the appellant as stated under section 21 of the Islamic University of Bahawalpur Act, 1975 and appeal against the Chancellor of the University. Was gone Under Section 11A and / or 42 of the Islamia University of Bahawalpur Act 1975, the appeal of the decision / order intra-court could not be sustained as the provisions of this Act affected it. High Court, Act 3 (2) of the Law Reform Ordinance 1972, found no need to look for other objections in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
