Find a Lawyer

MADEEHA SAGHEER versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Article 199 Constitutional Application The applicant, a first-year student of the MBB section, was refused by authorities / universities from one medical college to another, according to the first year of the MBB. Transfers were not allowed even after completion Once the question of upgrade for a valid applicant migrating against the vacant seat can be created only if the number of candidates exceeds the number of seats, self finance In the absence of vacancy on the basis, the applicant should be adjusted against the regular seat. Yes, refusing to allow migration is harmful to the interests of citizens and taxpayers.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• BAREEHA ZAINAB v. UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES 2011 CLC 1216
• MUHAMMAD AKHTAR v. Mst. SIANI 2011 CLC 1218
• Sardar NISAR AHMED v. State 2011 YLR 1219
• JAVAD IQBAL KHAN v. NAHID HUSSAIN 2011 PCrLJ 1220
• Syed NAJAM ALI SHAH v. MUHAMMAD HAJI 2011 CLD 1225
• FAROOQ ALI AKBAR v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1225
• MUHAMMAD AMEER AZAM v. ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY, BAHAWALPUR 2011 PLC(CS) 1227
• MOONIS ELAHI v. JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT, OFFENCES IN BANK 2011 PCrLJ 1228

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

best advocate from Naukundi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes