Find a Lawyer

MUNIR versus STATE

Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/392/411/34 Kuttle Emad, robbery, burglary of receiving stolen property; The complainant was involved in the case. The statement made during the interrogation was found guilty of all the accomplices of the accused, but no one could be punished for the misconduct of others and the release of the prisoners on the charge of kidnapping them started the trial itself. There was no restriction on the accused's bail. In view of section 7497 (), CRPC's case under section 7497 (2), CRPC and its crime requires further investigation, the accused was admitted on bail under the circumstances.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD AMEER AZAM v. ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY, BAHAWALPUR 2011 PLC(CS) 1227
• MOONIS ELAHI v. JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT, OFFENCES IN BANK 2011 PCrLJ 1228
• NASEER AHMED v. State 2011 MLD 1228
• Malik ASHIQ HUSSAIN v. SECRETARY, PAKISTAN RAILWAY 2011 YLR 1228
• MUHAMMAD HANIF v. A.D.J. 2011 YLR 1234
• MUHAMMAD MANZOOR v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Officer Revenue, Vehari 2011 CLC 1235
• MUHAMMAD BASHIR ABBASI v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 PLC(CS) 1236
• MUHAMMAD ZAFAR v. ADMINISTRATOR, MARKET COMMITTEE, AHMEDPUR EAST, DISTRICT BAHAWALPUR 2011 PLC(CS) 1239

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

jobs for fresh advocates from FR Bannu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes