Find a Lawyer

SYED NAJAM ALI SHAH versus MUHAMMAD HAJI

Section 118 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XXXVII, Rr 1 & 2 The plaintiff not only signed the promissory note proof fingerprint expert report for the receipt of the money, but as well as the thumb impression on it. Was also noted. Recovery but the trial court dismissed the trial court in favor of the plaintiff not properly appreciating the evidence of the parties, which required the intervention of the High Court in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the appellant, which was recorded by the trial court. And the judgment was decided in favor of the plaintiff in the case.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD AKHTAR v. Mst. SIANI 2011 CLC 1218
• Sardar NISAR AHMED v. State 2011 YLR 1219
• JAVAD IQBAL KHAN v. NAHID HUSSAIN 2011 PCrLJ 1220
• MADEEHA SAGHEER v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 YLR 1222
• FAROOQ ALI AKBAR v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1225
• MUHAMMAD AMEER AZAM v. ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY, BAHAWALPUR 2011 PLC(CS) 1227
• MOONIS ELAHI v. JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT, OFFENCES IN BANK 2011 PCrLJ 1228
• NASEER AHMED v. State 2011 MLD 1228

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocate from Vehari lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes