PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE versus ANWAR JALIL
Sections 2 (8) and (9) withholding property and displacement laws (repealed) Act (XIV of 1975), section 2 (2) settlement scheme number 1, paragraph 28 constitution pakistan, article 199 constitutional petition withdrawal property prices Determined by the accuracy of the notification officer's assessment of the value of the property pursuant to paragraph 28 of the disputed subdivision scheme I, the notification officer / deputy commissioner notified persons (compensation and maintenance) dated 14.11 1974. Was able to determine the price according to the notification. ) Act, 1958 Item 6, it was expressly stated that the Deputy Secretary (Rural), the Board of Revenue, shall exercise the powers of the Pricing Notification Officer, pending matters in the relevant matters and the notified officer. Comes in praise of At the time, the notified officer exercised his powers in accordance with the law and the petition, erroneously failed to prove that the notified officer did not exercise his powers or exercise his powers. In practice, he acted illegally or because of material misconduct the High Court refused to interfere with the value of the property in question by the notification officer
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
