ABDUL GHAFFAR versus D.G. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Sections 16, 17 and 21 (2) of the Environmental Tribunal Rules, 1999, R13 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Chapters XXII A (Sections 265A to 265N) and Section 133 Environmental Tribunals for Appellant's Poultry Farms Ordered to move Environmental Accuracy Section 17 (i) of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997 provided for penalties in which the Environment Tribunal has special jurisdiction under Section 21 (2) of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997 Was. At the trial of the offenses punishable under section 17 of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997, the Environment Tribunal was handed the powers of the Court of Session under Rule 1898 of the Environment Tribunal. ()) The Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997 was read with the Environmental Tribunal Rules, R.R. 13 of 1999, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 was enforced before the Environmental Tribunal object to eliminate the evil of environmental pollution. Was. The tribunal was entrusted with the powers of the court meeting, which should have heard the appeals under Chapter XXIIA of the Code of Conduct, did not pass after implementing the proposed procedure of 1898 and under section 17 of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997 The sentence awarded was not given to any appellant, the orders imposed were not sustainable under the law and the appeals were accepted and the cases were referred to the Environment Tribunal. De novo trial under Chapter XXII A of the Criminal Code, 1898
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
