The issuance of counterfeit checks in the section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F, denying the bank's return of the checks in the dispute revealed that the checks were dishonored by two objections. And according to the photo account bank's objection, the first party proved that the accused had no intention of paying the complainant on the day when an accused issued a bogus check of his account to the complainant with his large sum of money. The fraud that was already closed and furthermore it was a photo account in which the accused had an act of economic murder of the complainant, in which case the investigating officer had no right to be found, the whole of the fraudster accused the two property dealers. Was filed by the complainant, on any basis, the police file shows that the investigating officer has not He had never received any money from the accused before the High Court today issued a notice had to be added to or presented to investigation or deny the crimes of the property dealer. The charge, although not subject to section 497, the CRC prohibited clause, however, was that b grant was not the rule of universal application in such cases each case had to be viewed on its own facts and circumstances by the complainant. Any unethical or unlawful activity was not disclosed to falsely implicate the accused as it was alleged that he was not entitled. Exception to bail, his bail application dismissed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
