Sections 5 (h) and 6 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O. VII, R 11 A civil servant, dismissing the compulsory annual confidentiality report of a defendant of a nature, proof of the plaintiff's evidence, annually I was saddened by these comments, that the plaintiff, another civil servant trial court, dismissed the allegations for not disclosing the reason for the action. It is permissible that for the wrongful act of defamation, it was necessary, at least in addition to the abuser. With less than one person making defamation material, recipient communications must allege that the plaintiff was defamed or ridiculed. It was reported that the plaintiff lacked any such details and communication was incomplete without miscommunication. Annual confidential report of a civil servant on the confidential opinion of the officers reporting on the performance, performance and abilities of the service officers. Consisted of The subordinate officer, as the report suggests, provided such remarks that the details of the claim in strict confidence under the provisions of the D-Law were given to the extent that the falsehoods of the statement, injury to dignity or The components of a claim must be clearly distinguished from litigation as a result of a false statement. Proceedings, High Court refuses to interfere with order passed by trial court appeal
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
