ZIA SHAHID versus AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT, 1936
Sections 1 (4) and 2 (ia) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition, the applicants were running the newspaper establishment without any notice about the service, and no notice was issued to any of them. Be it through a common style or post. In the press for hearing on the date fixed for the hearing, when the petitioner proceeded against the former party, the applicant could not be legally prosecuted against the former party when he was not present at the hearing date. No notice was given for the previous date of , On the date after the hearing on the party to which it did not appear, cannot be regarded as relevant or permissible for the proceedings of the previous party, for which the party may, under constitutional jurisdiction, have any notice of proceedings against the High Court. Was not given. The previous party order against the applicants was approved as it was passed without legal law. The High Court directed the authorities to take a fresh decision. According to the law, on the merit of the defendant / employee, the petition was allowed under it
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
