The dishonesty of the accused, the dishonesty of the Section 497 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), the disqualification of the Section 489F check guarantee, has been compromised between the parties and the arrest of the accused of the same accused has been confirmed by the bail, the council added. Admitted that both the checks given to the complainant were dishonored and bail was given before arrest so the accused was also withdrawn, unable to explain the accused's lawyer for four years. The arrest of the accused, however, does not fall under the Prohibition Clause. Section 497, the CR PC, and the accused had been behind bars for a long time. And in such cases bail was a rule and the refusal was exempt, but the conduct of the accused clearly shows that he had previously misused the relief of the bail granted to him because the complainant had been given his Checks were dishonored and he was absconding with the law for almost four years was enough to justify such a charge as a general rule and he denied any arbitrary relief in favor of it. Bail application filed for expulsion of any power dismissed, circumstances r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
