Find a Lawyer

BHATTI COTTON LINKS THROUGH MUHAMMAD IQBAL BHATTI versus BANKING COURT NO.IV, LAHORE

Section 10 Case for Recovery of Debt Loan by the Bank In its absence, the defendant's request for leave to defend the defendant's case excludes the defendant's application without issue and without reference to the land. It was that in the relevant date, the Banking Court first decided the bank's request to obtain the previous order against the second defendant, while it was told that there would be no action on his leave application on that day, the correct impeachment order. There was no speaking order because the banking court did not provide a reason. The respondent was dismissed while dismissing the leave application as he was not given an appropriate hearing hearing on the leave request, which was not scheduled for hearing on the relevant date. The case was submitted to the banking court

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD QASIM ANSARI v. SECRETARY EDUCATION 2011 PLC(CS) 309
• EHSAN ABBAS v. KHUSH ABBAS 2011 PLD 311
• Mian MUHAMMAD SHABBIR v. State 2011 MLD 311
• UMER HAYAT v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER, (WORKS AND SERVICES DEPARTMENT),FAISALABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 312
• MURAD AHMAD KHAN v. PAKISTAN GOLF FEDERATION, RAWALPINDI 2011 PLD 313
• SADIQ HUSSAIN v. GHULAM RASUL 2011 PCrLJ 315
• MUHAMMAD ASIF v. ZARAI TARQIATI BANK LIMITED, PHALIA MANDI, BAHAUDDIN 2011 CLD 316
• MAHBOOB AHMAD v. Mst. FEROZA BEGUM 2011 CLC 319

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

top advocates from Hub Inds Estate lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes