Find a Lawyer

EHSAN ABBAS versus KHUSH ABBAS

Sections 15 and 19 (4) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Tenant Rent Tribunal, after the eviction of the tenants at the stage, the tenant's objection was rejected by the landlord submitting the witnesses' statement that section I9 ( 4) I have to use the word of. ) In spite of the use of the word \ word after compulsorily submitting the affidavits of the Punjab Rented Primes Act, 2009, section 19 (4) of the Punjab Rented Primes Act, 2009, in the nature of the Had to be created as Not required The Rent Tribunal had rightly rejected the objection raised by the tenant's constitutional application. Was excluded under the circumstances.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUSHTAQ AHMAD alias MUSTAFA v. State 2011 YLR 303
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. DILBAR KHAN 2011 CLC 304
• MUHAMMAD MAZHAR IQBAL v. State 2011 PLD 306
• MUHAMMAD QASIM ANSARI v. SECRETARY EDUCATION 2011 PLC(CS) 309
• Mian MUHAMMAD SHABBIR v. State 2011 MLD 311
• UMER HAYAT v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER, (WORKS AND SERVICES DEPARTMENT),FAISALABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 312
• BHATTI COTTON LINKS through Muhammad Iqbal Bhatti v. BANKING COURT NO.IV, LAHORE 2011 CLD 312
• MURAD AHMAD KHAN v. PAKISTAN GOLF FEDERATION, RAWALPINDI 2011 PLD 313

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

law websites from Gujranwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes