Section 302 (b) Reaction of Evidence in Canon Martyrdom (10 of 1984), Arts 117 and 122 Conviction The death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment and it was charged that it was guilty of certain facts / circumstances. Failed to submit explanation. The accused was sentenced under Section 302 (b), PPC for unnatural conduct of the accused which resulted in his wife being strangled to death and the trial court high court upheld the conviction of the accused. But for this purpose, his death sentence was reduced to life imprisonment. The incident has not been proven. Medical evidence suggests that the victim was strangled to death by strangulation, which ruled out the possibility of a natural death or suicide. The victim's death did not take part in the funeral procession of his deceased wife, neither did the police tell him about his wife. The accused also opted not to give evidence on oath under Section 340 (2) of the law, martyrdom of the law under PRPR 122, 1984, but if any particular fact is in the knowledge of any person in particular. He rushed to the hospital. The burden of proving this fact was that the prosecution, at present, has established its own case against the accused. The two witnesses were acquitted and medical evidence has confirmed that the deceased was not involved in the funeral procession of his wife, who died while living with him. Neither reported the police nor rushed his wife to the hospital and went missing for two months. Such circumstances confirmed the prosecution's case, giving reasonable explanation for unnatural conduct in the absence of the accused. It was alleged that the accused was an A
