DR. AZIM-UR-RAHIM KHAN MEO versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
R&A and since [since excluded] the Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 19733), section 2 (1) (a) of the Sindh Civil Servants (Regulating Ad hoc Appointments) Act (XIX of 1994), Sec. 2 (2) Sindh Government Employees (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975, R10 West Pakistan Secretariat (Section Officers) Service Rules, 1962 Handbook of Pakistan, Article 212 (3) Interlocutory dispute regarding seniority ad hoc appointment The scope section officer (BS17) was appointed directly by the provincial chief minister under the Sindh Public Service Commission (Functions) Rules 1990 R5, without the formal appointment of the Sindh Public Service Commission and Without ad hoc appointments, the applicant was appointed as a Section Officer at BPS 17 through Sindh. In 1992, the Public Service Commission (Commission) appointed qualified individuals in 1991, after being directly handed over to the Commission through the desired use of powers directly by the provincial Chief Minister. The applicants' requirements of the Sindh Public Service Commission (Functions) Rules 1990 R5 (as it was then) were that the appointment of the defendants could not be considered and treated for the purpose of determination of the elder. Should. Equivalent to ad hoc appointments that require regularity. That the Sindh Civil Servants (Regulatory Ad hoc Appointments) Act, 1994, was enacted on 28 7 1994, and that the respondents regularly received the status of regular employees for the purposes of the said Act. Was. It is their opinion that, in such circumstances, the respondents could not be granted the status of applicant as a Senior, i.e., the Sindh Civil Servants Act 1, by the Applicants.
