Sections 9 (b) and (c) convictions for possession of drug paraphernalia, not a separate sample taken from each packet of drugs sent to test only one sealed sample sent to test the effect of intoxicating drug. Importance of type, export, cannabis [baked cannabinoids] The less harmful drug addict was allegedly carrying 170kg of cannabis, hidden in secret parts of the car boot, the trial court accused. Was convicted under the Narcotic Substances Act Section 9 (C). , 1997 and was sentenced to life imprisonment with a further instruction to pay a fine of one lakh rupees and his conviction was dismissed by the Appeal and High Court filed by the accused. He refused to run from where the narcotics were found and admitted that he had been stopped at the check post, but said that the narcotics were manufactured and an affidavit was filed in this regard. However, personally the accused did not demand the preparation of the person as a defense witness nor filed his statement on the oath, his The prosecution had set up drug recovery from the vehicle driven by the accused, the vehicle was thoroughly searched and then there was no reason for the prosecution's witnesses to falsely implicate the suspect, Unbeknown to the report, the Franzik Science Laboratory report also confirmed that the substance sent as a sample is marijuana. But when it was proved that the seized substance sent for chemical examination was char, no Could not imagine the full extent of the material seized by the accused
