MUHAMMAD ANAYET GONDAL versus THE REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
OI, R10 Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal Act (XII of 1991) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 18 The Judicial Officer was recorded during the interrogation proceedings regarding the witness testimony / inquiry proceedings of the party dismissed. R10, under CPC, filed a petition demanding that the evidence of the Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal be enrolled in the inquiry before it was enforced as a party to the case. Done. Facts to the attention of the Inquiry Officer but that did not mean that he could be a party. Such a witness is merely an informant and a witness which in the present case is only a disciplinary action against the judicial officer / applicant. , Which was between employer and employee. Cannot be turned into a dispute by an outsider, and was especially considering that the right to resign from the job to the applicant under Article 18 of the Constitution could also be included in the present case. That, as a party to the extent of the application of the witness to the investigation proceedings by the Service Tribunal, was not guaranteed, accordingly
