Section 2 302 (b) / 4 324 / at e / ?88 sentenced to prosecution testimony, reduction of FIR was immediately recorded to the prosecutor's witness, in the presence of which the defendant A fire was inflicted on the thigh, the spot was natural in his presence, six crime spaces and firearms were recovered at the notice of two suspects, sent to the firearms specialist. And the firearms expert reported that all six were fired from the rifle recovered from the main suspect and one of his co-accused was subjected to specific injuries on the victim, who was later found on the man. Found. The person killed by the doctor, who underwent a post-mortem examination, also had the main purpose of defending the accused. He was already present at the time of the incident and the remaining accused later appeared in the prosecution. In the circumstances, he had proved his case against him, beyond the reasonable doubt of the two accused, the case of the other two suspects was also suspected. Because they have assigned injuries. Five other people were also assigned to the deceased person, the question of joint intent was not proved by the facts and circumstances of the case, as four persons were found innocent during the interrogation, three remained unknown and two were tried at trial. Court prosecution acquitted. In the circumstances, not telling the truth to some extent and deliberately hiding some factual facts from the court, the prosecutor was obliged to prove his case. And the benefit of every doubt should be extended to the accused, the prosecution was able to prove its case against the main accused and his co-accused, while the other two defendants.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
