Section 2 302 (b) proved the value of the evidence, the reduction of the prosecution's testimony, the minor daughter of both the accused and the victim, who was // 8 years old, was a credible witness, even though she was underage. , But his questions and his answers proved that he was smart enough to testify and that there was no barrier to aging that in this regard, the minor witness had clearly stated that his father ( The accused) fired at him `` Mama's second witness, this was also a natural witness, which was presented by a minor witness, the other witnesses of the prosecution confirmed it regularly. , Who saw the suspect standing near the victim with a pistol and then reported the injured Franzik Science Laboratory, which was negative. A controversial piece of evidence and by no means imagined would be sufficient to substantiate the evidence on record for the neglect of the strong ocular account presented by the minor witness. E was truly punished against the accused, but there were some mitigating circumstances in the case. The motive was not disclosed, what happened immediately after the incident, was not disclosed, repentance after the incident. An attempt was made to save and save the victim. Because of this, the heat of emotion that was not explicitly put on the record, the death sentence awarded to the accused was more severe on the side aid, though he was responsible for the imprisonment of the death, thus ending the appeal for justice. Will be fulfilled Only Section 2302 (b), while maintaining the conviction of the accused under PPC, was accepted to the extent of punishment, its
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
