Find a Lawyer

MISS AMY J. KING versus KHALID AZIZ

Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XVII, R 3 The trial court for possession by special performance restrained the plaintiff's right to present evidence and the appellate court appealed under section 115, CPC Deleted. While the trial court allowed the defendants ample opportunity to present their evidence, the facts stated in the plaintiff did not create any possibility for the implementation of the agreement. In favor of the plaintiffs, therefore, obtaining a case remand and forcing the parties to resume proceedings would not be appropriate and the appropriate amendment was excluded in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ v. State 2011 PCrLJ 869
• Mst. RAZIA BEGUM v. State 2011 PCrLJ 873
• MUDASSAR ALI SHAH v. State 2011 MLD 873
• RASHEEDA BIBI v. MUHAMMAD ILYAS REHAN 2011 YLR 876
• IMAN ULLAH v. JUSTICE OF PEACE/ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE RAJANPUR DISTRICT 2011 YLR 883
• MUHAMMAD TARIQ SAEED v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Forest, Wildlife and Fisheries Department 2011 PLC(CS) 884
• Mst. NAEEM AKHTAR v. WAKEEL BADSHA 2011 PCrLJ 886
• HAYAT KHAN v. State 2011 YLR 890

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

how to become a advocate from Kundina lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes