SYED GHULAM ABBAS SHIRAZI versus GHULAM HUSSAIN SINDHU
Proof of pre-discrimination right was dismissed under section 13, but the lower appellate court allowed the appeal and the trial court ruled that the plaintiff had questioned whether the question was grounded. ? Earlier, the importer was talking, so he knew the seller in favor of the seller was only justified because the land of the pre-emptor was connected to the land of dispute as it did not prove that the date of the sale to the pre-emptor. I knew about sales. The question of making the required students in question was a question of fact and could not be disturbed by the lower appellate court's finding on the second appeal, not to read any false statement or evidence, oral or documentary documents, to be absent. The reason was pointed out that due to such misrepresentation and non-reading of evidence, fact finding of the lower appellate court could not be excluded by the High Court while the appeal was decided on the second appeal. ? Under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
