In order to recover the possession of section 8, the defendants filed a case for possession of the disputed land because they own it and have leased it to the defendants but the defendants refused to pay the rent. The defendants had sued on the basis that they had occupied the disputed land since the days of their forefathers and had been in possession of the same land for more than 50 years. The trial court appealed the case to the appellant. And set aside its decision and order. In the cross-examination of the trial court, a defendant admitted that 3/4 rooms were constructed by the defendants, no written or oral evidence was presented by the defendants which confirmed that The defendants were tenants / leases, but the evidence presented by the plaintiffs showed that the defendants had long been in possession of the disputed property and had constructed their houses on the said land. One of the Plaintiffs confessed in its statement that there was no tenant or house in his village The Plaintiff's admission was sufficient to disprove his claim against the Plaintiff. Alihan failed to deny the claim that he owned the last suit land. 50 years and such a trial was halted at a time when the appellate court momentarily scanned the evidence and concluded that the defendant's tenants were not completely on record. The review request was established on
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
