Section 302 (b) / 324/34/109 Appealing and Defending Evidence Definition Although medical evidence could not clarify the names of the assailants, it has confirmed that the medical evidence of eyewitnesses is strong. Supporting the evidence of the ocular account, the report of the forensic science laboratory confirmed that the rifle was recovered from the recovered recesses on the spot, the licensed rifle recovered recovered, and the forensic science laboratory report. Further confirmation was made. In the general account there is no doubt, the witnesses were related to the accused and they also hated the accused, but since there was sufficient consensus available, their evidence was not excluded only on the basis of their relationship with the victim and the enmity with the prosecution. It could, in the circumstances, have proved beyond any doubt the case against the accused, however, in some cases the prosecution's case required a reduction. Ion changed the location of the incident and the prosecutor's insistence was not proved. But the inquiry report states that both father and son jointly opened fire on the deceased. God, the Father accused was acquitted by pressing the trial court. The injury to the accused person was an incident which indicated that the prosecution had concealed something that had happened before the incident, the prosecution had also hid something from the court due to the murder of the deceased, death. Extreme punishment could not be imposed. The accused, sentenced to death under circumstances, was sentenced to life imprisonment
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
