VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES versus BREEHA ZAINAB
Sections 2, 8, 10, 22 and 23 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 (2) MBB Section Course, Admission to the Vice-Chancellor of the Admission to the CC, Academic Competency Order in Council of University denies admission to defendant (admission) High court infractions approves defendant's constitutional request by Vice-Chancellor, University Maintenance Aptitude Academic University, MBB section, classes I had the option of making decisions about enrolling students. According to Sections 8 and 10 of the University of Health Sciences Lahore Ordinance, 2002, the Vice-Chancellor of the University was one of the officers and officers, against whom an academic council in section 22 (IV) of the Revision Ordinance. Was mentioned. Earlier, MBA section classes were provided under section 10 of the Student Admissions Ordinance Appellant. Under Section 10 of the Act, it was objected to by the respondent's retention of the constitutional application filed on the basis of the availability of the remedy to be revised, and then the defendant first chose to avail of such treatment. Before the Chancellor, the remedy for review was against the defendant. The order denying the Vice-Chancellor entry, such order shall be construed as a real order for the purpose of proviso under section 3 (2) of the Law Reform Ordinance, 1972, the entry court was not appealable and the circumstances I was fired. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
