Article 199 Applicants of the Constitutional Application Educational Institution Examination challenged the marking of question papers by an external inspector on the basis that one of the 15 marks comprises two parts of the question to test any of these sections. Have the option of The Applicants first tried to assert that the Applicants took the position that the correct answers were crossed by them and no marks were given, the Reaching Committee affiliated with the powers of scrutiny, though giving the number itself. If not permitted, it may indicate failures and failures of the examiners. However, if it turns out that the answers are correct and the examiner erroneously refuses to mark it, the rechecking committee may take action against such recalcitrant examiners under the rules of the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education. Is. The objection was then sent to the Chairman Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education to deal with the complaints of the applicants as soon as possible, within two days after the High Court summoned the Chairman Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education on remand. Only to decide. The High Court further directed that the Chairman should not have the liberty to seek the assistance of expert or specialists in the relevant article, deciding whether the answer to the contentious question by the applicants was correct. However, if the examiner finds that the conduct of the examiner is inverted, the chairman should take action against the examiner under the rules.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
