Section 19 Property Act (I82 of I82), Sections 52 and 54 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 suit provides for the seller's property rights in the territory of the state for the specific performance of the pre-sale contract Consequently, the shopkeeper proved to be sacked after the plaintiff (advance buyer) filed the proprietary rights to the shop without notice of advance contract and lawlessness. Under section 19 of the Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912, the advance agreement in favor of the plaintiff was declared void. And the date of this case was filed under the forecasts of 6 197 1977, filed in 7 10 1982, which were banned on the sale deal in favor of the plaintiff on the grant of the proprietary rights in the default contract. Was raised to execute. According to the terms of such a prior agreement, which would come into force after the granting of proprietary rights, the plaintiff was at risk of losing his money if, according to such first agreement, the seller failed to sell In order to perform the post-sale process in the case of property rights, he was obliged to pay for the specified amount in addition to the twenty amounts already paid, the collateral of public lands (such as in the previous agreement) There was no need to get permission under section 19 of the Punjab) Act, 1912. The sale of immovable property will not create any interest in itself nor will there be any right or title or charge to the property or the evidence on record shows that the plaintiff has been in possession of the suit land since 1982, It was enough to set up a sales notice in favor of the incoming seller, followed by the seller
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
