Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), section 392/411 theft, receiving stolen property fraudulently, delay of two months in filing an FIR was not reasonably specified, for the first time the accused by the Sessions Court Was released on bail, which was later canceled by the same court, which was recovered by the accused by which the complainant knew about the accused's involvement in the matter, through inquiry. Four FIR witnesses did not disclose in their statements recorded. Three days after the FIR was registered, the officer involved in the crime under Section 392, the PPC needs further investigation, while under Section 411, the probable clause of the offense under section 497 of the PPC Did not come under, CRPC was the accused. No ex-offender could get bail
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
