Section 302 (b) of the Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section5 Qatl Proof filed with the AMD Defendant E-Defendants of the Prison Appeal for more than seven years after they were subjected to a bona fide error appeal Was moved forward and its relatives also preferred the appeal; it was a reasonable basis for the delayed concession that under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the delay in granting restraint to the jurisdiction of the condolences would not be allowed. , Should be used independently to ensure administration is made just an hour after the incident and one hour and five minutes before his death. Justice ended with the true spirit, in which it was clearly stated that the accused had suffered his injuries, the death of the victim was proved by the prosecution's witnesses, such as making false accusations in the accused's case. There was no reason, and he did not need any further comment. The eyewitnesses were reasonably exhausted. They showed their presence near the scene of the incident and they were firm about seeing the incident. The claim allegedly failed to establish in a positive manner and will face the same trial. The litigation was considered because the prosecution and the accused has been removed as failure to meet the ends of justice had appealed to life imprisonment the accused conditions
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
