The section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), the charge of section 376 rape, the defendant's denial was named in the FIR and it was alleged that he and the co-accused had committed adultery with the complainant. Medico was legally upholding such an allegation of torture. The complainant's report, which showed that there were two signs of torture on the complainant's 7/8 day body delay in filing the FIR, was not intended to extend the accused to bail, as A decision can only be made on a bail application. Based on a temporary review of the prosecution's evidence, the trial record revealed that the accused was charged by the trial court, but that the act of the suspect is delaying the trial because his lawyer The witnesses are not being interimly examined by. The indictment was against the accused, which falls within the scope of the Prohibition Clause 749 prohibition, CCPC Council did not provide any reason for the accused to be involved in the accused. The bail was rejected in this case
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
