A. XXXVII, RR 2 and 3 Stamp Act (III of 1899), sections 12, 35, 36 and 61 for the collection of notes on the note, the execution of the note and its receipt by its author and extraordinary Evidence prepared by witnesses The trial court has claimed on the basis that there was no cancellation of any of the fifty (50) adhesive stamps at the time of his execution. That is, cancellation of the ticket is intended to prevent its re-use and not to penalize the beneficiaries of the pro note. The edge of the six adhesive stamps was touched, which he might have considered for the purpose of cancellation. Such suspicion should be taken advantage of by the Stamp Act, Claim Section 35 of the Stamp Act, 1899, was a precautionary arrangement. According to section 36 of 1899, a document once admitted into evidence cannot be challenged at any stage of the proceedings without being legally sealed. Under section 61, his respondent did not object to the written statement that nothing specific could be appropriate about the cancellation of the postage questioned by the plaintiff, especially when the execution of the pro note. And if the recovery was properly proved, the High Court accepted the appeal in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
