CHINA BEIJING CORPORATION versus AHMAD BAKHSH CONSTRUCTION CO.
AIX, Rr 6, 13 and Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application The request for separation of the preceding Part Decree suit was decided earlier because the defendant's representative failed to appear in court. It was filed by the plaintiff company through its project manager, which was dealing with the case at place B, that means the sub-office of the company was available as project manager, by the defendant appearing in court with his representatives. Did not deny. OCP, R 13, CPC and section 12 (2), together with the preceding injunction filed by the defendant, cannot be served to the CPC simultaneously by the defendant. Because they were self-contradictory objections in which the defendants had contradicted themselves. The High Court was not taken before the lower courts. The plaintiff (applicant) did not come to the High Court with clear hands. His lawyer, who had appeared in the lower courts, had taken the stand that the respondent had been present in the lower courts. Presenters were not authorized constitutional petition dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
