Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 377 unnatural crime bail, approval of the benefit of doubt No further investigation suspect was named in the FIR, which was filed approximately 9 hours after the incident. His next door was a neighbor. Complainant / victim, who was an 11th grade student. His mistake in naming the accused in the FIR has raised many questions. And the allegations against the accused clearly require further investigation and investigation, the supplementary statement recorded the next day cannot be equated with the FIR, in fact, for the person named in the FIR Alternatively, raise doubts about the suspect's involvement in the commission. The alleged crime, even the slightest doubt about the prosecution version, had to be resolved in favor of the accused, even at the bail-out stage, after the accused was subsequently admitted to bail,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
