ALI SHER ALIAS MUHAMMAD SHER THROUGH ALI MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Section 302 (b) / 34 Qatl e amd Appraisal of evidence The incident was a one-day incident and its purpose was proved. The circumstances proved that the parties knew each other first and the identity of the accused was not a matter. ? In which each of the deceased was charged with post-mortem delays due to a specific injury but this was not the case as a result of which the FIR could be lodged at a desolate stage and there was no enmity between the parties. Was not present and the defense was unable to do so. Record the previous animosity between the complaining party and the accused Ocular Account, in which case reliable, reliable and medical evidence was assisted, the motive for the defendant's defense taken by the accused and the fugitive is absolutely untrue. There was confidence and unnatural evidence proved that the two accused had a joint intention to kill the victim, unless firing just one shot could reduce the suspect's case, unless he intended to die. Other accused accused of not intending to support other cases, demanded less punishment, which in this case ER were present, the suspect was armed with a rifle while sitting with his co-accused, was waiting for prospects, I expect that they will pass through. After the trial, the slightest punishment provided by law was the death penalty, but if some circumstances demand a lower sentence, the court will consider these tense situations. But in the present case, it was not happening that the accused had taken drastic action. And even in terms of the amount of punishment, he did not deserve any relaxation.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
