MERAJ AGRO, CHEMICAL (PVT.) LTD. versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE
A. XXXVII, RR 2 and 3 Defend the suit to recover the money on the basis of the so-called check, apply for the claim of the plaintiff that the plaintiff's son-in-law was an accountant who left the job without notice. Accounts and check books related to defendant taken away from books. Before the plaintiff filed a lawsuit, the defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff and under his son's law, the trial court accepted the leave request made by the plaintiff under the bank guarantee provision. The imposition of the court was at the discretion of the court, which should not be a harsh defendant. The authorized defense was that instead of imposing a strict stipulation for bank guarantee submission, the defendant could be instructed to submit to another person a personal guarantee or a guaranteed guarantee, which is valid through a document of real estate title. The fair price is equivalent to the High Court amending the defamation order and directing the defendant to submit such bond within the stipulated time. r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
