Article 5 and Schedule of the Constitution of Pakistan, the Constitutional Applicant Plaintiff filed a case against the Defendant for monthly receipt of Rs. 317,260 and recovery of Rs. And the defendant did not compete. The trial was dismissed by the plaintiff in the former court which was heard by the appellate court defendant stating that no recovery of the purchase of the dowry articles was proved by any of the witnesses of the same plaintiff. Nor did he pay any restitution. To record that the plaintiff is a disobedient wife, the claim of recovery of the dowry articles was successful by the defendant successfully examining himself as a witness and listing the articles of the dowry signed by him. And had shown on file without any objection to any aspect of the court below that the plaintiff failed to submit its dowry receipt and the articles were merely technical of the procedure which was specifically Should be disregarded when the evidence was not rejected and the earlier proceedings have not yet separated the judgment by the defendant. Was held and was the result of non-reading and misreading of the court orders. The High Court allowed the petition to be signed and the decisions and orders of the two 2000 courts from December 2000 to January 2003 were kept monthly for Rs 5,000 every month. Unless the spouse is married and the dowry articles are recovered or replaced, the price is Rs 317,260.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
