Section 2 30b (b) in respect of the power to file the FIR was reasonably speedy and the possibility of discussion and consultation in such a promptly filed FIR is dropped, the name of the accused, The complainant mentioned the incident, the location of the injury, the weapon used during the incident and the prosecution's witnesses in the FIR, the prosecutor proved the motive part of his story, both witnesses Was examined by the defense, but their evidence was not lightened in any way. Led to the murder of the victim and they agreed on all material points. There were no contradictions or any improvement in the nightly events, but prosecutors identified the suspect in the light of the electric bulb. Although the police did not take him into custody during the interrogation, it would not affect the litigation, although one of the prosecution's witnesses was the victim's real brother and the nephew's other nephew, but with the victim. There was no reasonable basis for their relationship to be excluded from their testimony because both said the witnesses were not unfriendly to the accused and had no reason to make false allegations in the case. Whose presence at the time of its existence was well explained by the fact that the accused had no casualties with the accused. The proposal was not sure, this was the only suspect in the case was to be an alternative suspect. The complainant of an unusual case, who was the real brother of the victim, falsely implicated in the absence of any enmity.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
