KOHINOOR TEXTILE MILLS LTD. versus RAWALPINDI CANTONMENT BOARD, RAWALPINDI
Sections 178A, 179, 180, 181 (6) and 273 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXLIII, R3 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution of the Constitution Application Notice of Law, Release of Approval of the Cantonment Board Effect The board issued a notice to the applicant company to demolish the building, alleging that the applicant had illegally claimed that he had submitted all the required documents and the board stated that the cantonment The crime of unauthorized construction has been further complicated by the payment of board fees. Whether the construction taken before the issuance of this notice was illegal and it was reasonable to demolish it, it was further argued that a petition under section 273 of the Cantons Act, 1924 is not applicable, pending review by the applicant. Prior to the notice section was issued under the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 273 of 1924, O XLIII, R 3 CPC, and the notice referred to the law provisions before the Appeal against any order referred to PR. If respondents or defendants choose to appear in court, such notice of waiver is required. In any case, any errors in the requests will be accepted. And already, after the receipt of the notice and the passage of a month and 15 days more, it was considered to approve the cantonment board to be erected or re-erected. If the perpetrator had to commit the crime for the crime of the building and that too unconditionally, the repetition of the crime could be discouraged and could have arisen at such an extraordinary rate.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
