Section 302 (b) Definition of Evidence of Evidence The benefit of the doubt is that the unidentified persons were killed using firearms No suspicion was made against anybody after the statements of the prosecution witnesses. The trust, who allegedly saw the suspects near the scene of the incident, had made additional judicial confessions and other persons a month and seven days after the incident. Such joint extra-judicial confession is applicable to the law. His eyewitnesses did not have a record of the incident. The deceased was alone when he died. The place had found no weapons nor Jeremy was brought in and was recorded for The inclusion of the accused in this case. Identity parade medical evidence did not say what type of weapon was used in the prosecution case, all of which was based on the evidence of the accused, who was last seen near the scene. Other investigating officers found the accused innocent and their names. Not reported as the accused, in the report under Section 173, the CCPC also produced a large dent in the prosecution case. The firearms specialist was sent to confirm whether it was in working order or not but said there was no recovery benefit, no crime was recovered from the scene of the incident, even the doctor. The statement also did not indicate that carbine was used in the incident. The only evidence in this case was the unlawful confession offense against the accused, who was also present against the other accused, who were also tried by the trial corps.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
