MST. HUMAIRA NOREEN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Article 5 and the Schedule Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OX, R 2 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application seeking injunction for gold ornaments and personal property restoration and wife plaintiff's goods requiring that she be the owner of the property. Is done The court, signed by the plaintiff on the basis of the conviction on half of the property of the house, car, gold jewelry and the defendant's landed property, ordered the plaintiff to pay a court fee, which includes civil liability in the case. The claimant's claim cannot be retained by the appellate court order. Received the remand of the case with the direction of cross-examination of the parties under the validity of the trial court's OX, R2, CPC, as per the schedule of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, Dover, Restoration Allowance, Dowry and Personal Matters relating to matters The property of the wife and her belongings came under the jurisdiction of the judge, West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, although the terms of the agreement were not mentioned in the refusal. The defendant's husband has acknowledged the execution of the agreement so far, though, under certain compulsions, the matter must be declared as valid or invalid by the evidence by the parties, but the following courts have jurisdiction. Is not used in accordance with the law. Constitutional petition was allowed The unclean orders were set aside The trial was held in the trial court, with the order to decide the case and record the evidence and settle the matter according to law.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
