AURANGZEB SHAAFI BURKI versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199 and 255 (2) Constitutionally the appointment of the Ombudsman Oth, the petitioner's notice was terminated, in which the Ombudsman was sworn in as a respondent. The Acting Governor declared this law unlawful, under Article 255 (2) of the Constitution, which was required to be made before a particular person, and if it was unenforceable for any reason, It can be nominated in front of another person. In the absence of the Governor from the President of Pakistan to act as Governor, therefore, the Acting Governor was able to take oath from the Ombudsman, under which the Acting Governor was appointed by the Governor of Pakistan to act as Governor. Was directed, which shows that the applicant has accepted the appointment. Without the appointment of a acting governor, the appointment of acting governor applicants cannot challenge the governor's act, which he did after he was nominated as acting governor was constitutional remedial, especially Article 199 of the constitution. (2) (b) (ii) The principle asserted under Virento was claimed on the principle that such discretion had to be exercised by the High Court. According to judicial principles and not as a matter, to exercise such discretion, the applicant's conduct was very relevant and his allegation was based on instability and to discredit and discredit the respondents. The matters prepared were highlighted. The acting Governor's constitutional request before the Ombudsman was interrupted and sworn in was circumstantial
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
