Articles 2 (2 (b), 4 324, 7 Qat. L. and 392 after murder), on the day of the trial, causing injury and robbery. Failure to name the accused in the FIR, was sufficiently explained by the prosecution. The complainant's home, on the occasion, was quite natural, given the full details of the incident in the FIR and before the courtroom witnesses testified that the complainant had testified. In the absence of any deep enmity between the parties, the independent witness dismissed the elephant in the absence of any deep enmity between the parties in which the accused was injured and killed. The power was obtained and his statement was confirmed by the injury statement of the accused, on which the accused was arrested on the spot and two pistols and cash recovered from his possession were recovered from the scene. The strip was also recovered and in this regard the report of the forensic science laboratory was received. The exported cash was not submitted to the trial court; the charge under section 392, PPC was suspended and the accused acquitted. However, the conviction was not upheld after the prosecution had proved the allegations and under it. Was available in favor of the accused and accordingly his death sentence was confirmed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
