Find a Lawyer

NADEEM IQBAL versus MUHAMMAD KABIR KHAN

Article 199 Constitutional application in which the corporation is requested to issue writ in the case of minor High Court custody, exercising its extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction, is not generally disputed in a controversial question of fact. And the High Court denies the detailed investigation. , In his hereditary jurisdiction, may issue a decree in the welfare and best interests of the minor and whether the minor was in the absence of his mother (who had passed away), the mother of the infant / breastfeeding age. Priority was entitled to minor care \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• ZAHID HUSSAIN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 344
• LAHORE CONSERVATION SOCIETY v. CHIEF MINISTER OF PUNJAB 2011 PLD 344
• FMC UNITED PVT. LTD. through Company Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary of Finance 2011 PTD 346
• KHURRAM BASHIR v. State 2011 MLD 346
• Sayyed HANAN KHALID GILLANI v. DISTRICT JUDGE/PRESIDING OFFICER DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, MULTAN 2011 PLD 349
• Mst. TABASSUM v. WAQAR HUSSAIN 2011 MLD 351
• Mst. SAIMA HAMEED v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (HEALTH), PAKPATTAN SHARIF 2011 PLC(CS) 351
• NASIR AMIN v. State 2011 YLR 353

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

ask a advocate free from Kashmore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes