SAYYED HANAN KHALID GILLANI versus DISTRICT JUDGE/PRESIDING OFFICER DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, MULTAN
Article 2 (c), 25 and 28 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Claim Animal Claims Against Suppliers Controversy between the parties was related to the supply of goods to the consumer. Who paid for it. It was claimed by consumers under section 28 of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005, which is found applicable by the consumer court in section 2 (j) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2005, therefore, the bird The same agreement and agreement between consumers and suppliers for the supply of chicks used in the common sense did not mean the supply of any product, the order passed by the trial court and section 28 of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act 2005 Claims rejected by the user under The petition was not upheld
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
