Find a Lawyer

MST. SAIMA HAMEED versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (HEALTH), PAKPATTAN SHARIF

Article 199 Constitution Petition Terminating Civil Service Service Applicant Challenges Order to Terminate His Service There was no age limit for the applicant's position in the legitimate newspaper advertisement After working with the Department in the past, The age limit of the applicant will be considered. After the appointment and participation, the applicant had obtained valuable rights through the authority and could not be returned in accordance with the principle of Luxury Poverty, because of this. A notice of reason was not issued to provide a hearing opportunity. In violation of the principles of illegal and natural justice, it was set aside that the applicant was ordered to be restored from the date of inclusion with all benefits \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• KHURRAM BASHIR v. State 2011 MLD 346
• NADEEM IQBAL v. MUHAMMAD KABIR KHAN 2011 YLR 348
• Sayyed HANAN KHALID GILLANI v. DISTRICT JUDGE/PRESIDING OFFICER DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, MULTAN 2011 PLD 349
• Mst. TABASSUM v. WAQAR HUSSAIN 2011 MLD 351
• NASIR AMIN v. State 2011 YLR 353
• TAHIR ABBAS v. FESCO, JHANG 2011 PLC(CS) 354
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM BHATTI v. Mst. GHULAM SUGHRA 2011 PLD 355
• MUHAMMAD MAZHAR v. MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ 2011 PCrLJ 357

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Burewala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes