LAHORE CONSERVATION SOCIETY versus CHIEF MINISTER OF PUNJAB
Article 199 Constitution Petition of Public Interest, High Court Jurisdiction, Environmental Impact of Use of Rules Flyover The dispute over the construction of a flyover on one of the main road applicants was controversial and claimed. Construction and the number of plants and trees was immense. Elimination and the health of the residents will have many problems. By cutting down the trees and shrubs, the beauty of the place will diminish, but after the completion of the project, new trees will be planted. It will be restored and some buildings will be built recently. Flyovers and underpasses can be copied as a scenario. For the better future, anyone has to lose something in the present. If the masses face any disadvantages during the completion of the project, then in the future. It will be a blessing to them as they are saved. Inappropriate traffic disruption and waste of valuable time, while standing on traffic signals, raised the facts that cannot be resolved in the proceedings under the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, but also competently approve the project in question. In the proper course of action, both the parties could not be allowed to declare the High Court challenging the problems and applicants could not be dealt with after recording evidence of quashing of traffic problems, instead of the case of a complaint. I, to make the applicants decide on litigation matters in the public interest Should refer to the relevant quarter but should be followed as well. Applicants with reasonable caution and caution
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
